Build my stackCopper vs Close
Evaluating Copper and Close requires comparing two popular options in the crm & sales space. While Copper is widely recognized for its ability to help a CRM that lives inside Google Workspace., Close is optimized for teams that need to focus on a CRM built for high-velocity inside sales teams.. In this hands-on evaluation, we look at their pricing structures, feature sets, user reviews, and performance to help you decide which tool fits your daily workflow best.
Based on our comprehensive evaluation metrics, Close emerges as the stronger overall choice for most teams, earning a score of 4.5 compared to 4.0 for Copper. A key factor in this recommendation is that Close provides well established product with an active user base, which helps streamline workflows. However, Copper remains an excellent alternative if your team is specifically looking for a tool optimized for a CRM that lives inside Google Workspace. and you value well established product with an active user base. Weigh the cost differences and feature limits carefully before making a commitment.
Copper vs Close at a glance
| Copper | Close | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Sales | CRM & Sales |
| Our rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Starts at | $12/mo | $49/mo |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Best for | A CRM that lives inside Google Workspace. | A CRM built for high-velocity inside sales teams. |
How they scored, dimension by dimension
In our testing, Close comes out on top for ease of use with a rating of 4.6 versus 4.1 for Copper. This difference reflects Close's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Copper is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Close is the stronger option for features with a rating of 4.5 versus 4.0 for Copper. This difference reflects Close's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Copper is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Close edges ahead on value with a rating of 4.4 versus 3.9 for Copper. This difference reflects Close's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Copper is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Close has the clear advantage on support with a rating of 4.5 versus 4.0 for Copper. This difference reflects Close's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Copper is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
Where Copper shines
- Well established product with an active user base
- Regular updates and clear roadmap
- Solid documentation and onboarding
- Our full hands-on testing is still in progress
- Pricing can climb on higher tiers
Where Close shines
- Well established product with an active user base
- Regular updates and clear roadmap
- Solid documentation and onboarding
- Our full hands-on testing is still in progress
- Pricing can climb on higher tiers
AI Head-to-Head Arbiter
Get an instant custom comparison and clear recommendation for your specific situation.
So which should you pick?
Choose Copper if
- Built for a CRM that lives inside Google Workspace.
- Budget is tight (from $12/mo)
- Well established product with an active user base
Choose Close if
- Built for a CRM built for high-velocity inside sales teams.
- ease of use and features matter most to you
- Well established product with an active user base
Common questions
Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy Copper or Close through the links on this page, at no extra cost to you. We only compare tools we have tested, and commissions never change our scores or which tool we recommend. We currently track 218+ tools.